A little local understanding

I’ve been thinking about “local” pubs recently and now I’ve decided to make it the subject of my first proper blog post, so here it is (go easy on me – I’m new to this!). It’s just an outpouring of the thoughts in my head, based on my own personal experience and a bit of no doubt ill-informed observation…

I saw an “advert” in my local CAMRA group’s magazine recently, advising members as to how to campaign against the closure of a local pub.  One thing seemed glaringly obvious to me by its omission – at no point was there any suggestion that actually using the pub, and getting others to do so, would be a good strategy.   Surely, a pub without customers is clearly not working, and if the local CAMRA don’t go there then (presumably) the beer selection either doesn’t include anything of interest to them, or is of poor quality.  So what is the point of campaigning to save a pub you’re not interested in using?  This brings to mind a (different) CAMRA branch who actively campaigned for the protection of one of the pubs in their own area against a planning application, citing the loss of a community facility etc, yet as far as i am aware not one of them was actually willing to drink in there themselves.

On the other hand, the advert did refer to “your local pub”.  So am I missing an obvious assumption that if it is your local, then you yourself must be using it?  Maybe that is what was meant, but if so, that wasn’t how it was interpreted by the group mentioned above, and I find it hard to relate to personally.  I have a local pub, i.e. the one closest to me.  I don’t use it. 

There are several pubs in my village and my local one is probably the last of the bunch that I would choose.  That said, I don’t really use any of them very much – because in most cases I’m not very impressed with the beer selection on offer at all, and at the one pub that I do like to use the one guest ale doesn’t provide as much variety as I really like.  Also, there is only so much time I can spend in pubs before I become very unpopular at home!  So my “locals” tend to be a small number of pubs close to my work locations in Birmingham (for example the Wellington, Shakespeare and recently the Post Office Vaults) and London (especially the Euston Tap right outside my office) which all give me a far better chance of finding a beer I want to drink, or (more often) new ones to try, and are also a jumping-off point for plenty of other great pub choices slightly further afield.

If my local pubs gave me a larger and better beer selection, then they’d be more appealing to me.  Does that mean, therefore, that I don’t think it is worth fighting for those other pubs, the ones I don’t want to actually use myself?  You’d be forgiven for thinking that was exactly the point I’m making, but it isn’t.  Quite the opposite in fact.  But I’m not sure that the reasons for making a stand about pub ‘x’ rather than pub ‘y’ are necessarily thought through.

Pubs that I consider poor generally fall into two categories – those that I would actually like to drink in if they offered a beer selection that appealed to me, and those that I would like to keep there in order to keep a segment of the drinking population away from those I do want to drink in.  If the latter type closes, then clearly there aren’t enough people who are prepared to drink there, and so maybe it isn’t fulfilling the purpose I thought it was.  But it could still be viable in a new format, and so there is still a case to oppose a change of use and certainly a demolition.

If on the other hand it is a pub that just doesn’t attract me, well, I’ve realised that waiting until it closes is leaving it a bit late to start the fight.  Unless people are using it and regularly asking for better beer, what incentive is there for the landlord to change things?  By the time a dwindling group of locals are no longer enough to support it, too much damage has been done.  There’s an example in my own village where one landlord has recently negotiated himself out of the tie on his lease, so he can choose freely what beer he makes available.  And yet on the times I’ve been in there since, I’ve seen the same, average beer from a major regional that was on the bar before.  Without enough demand for a more interesting selection of beer, nothing changes.

Until recently I thought I was lucky to live in a village with 9 pubs.  It’s down to 8 now, but that is still a reasonable number for the population they serve.  Except that all but one fit into my definition of poor, in that the beer selection doesn’t make them attractive to me (the converted one fitted into my other definition of poor!), and even the one I would choose every time above the others is limited in the number and turnover of its guest ales so doesn’t really satisfy my tastes.  I’m now beginning to think that these pubs are all surviving well enough and therefore, for now at least, I’m not going to see much change from any of them – they’ll mostly just keep ticking along, happy to stick with the status quo.  As a result my hopes of the quality cask and keg revolution hitting a pub in my own village are pretty unlikely to be realised – perhaps the local market is just too saturated for anyone to take a risk on changing it.  I’ve seen this in the lacklustre response to attempts at establishing a coordinated beer festival over a bank holiday weekend.  I’m convinced that would create some interest in the wider variety of quality ales available out there, but the response has been at best luke-warm. Several seem to like the idea, recognise it would be good for business, but translating that into action? Not a sign, but there’s still time.

So, have I really made a point about anything or have I just rambled on?  I’m not sure.  I think what I want to say is that, yes, pubs need saving – once converted or demolished they won’t usually be coming back.  Saving them isn’t just about fighting once they are closed though – if you don’t want pubs to close make sure you are using them, and try and create the demand for what you want to see them serving.

I’ve not made a New Year’s Resolution, bit if i did maybe it would be to follow my own advice, and make more of an appearance in my local pubs, pushing more for something better (in my own subjective opinion) on the bar.  Once they’ve closed it will be too late. I don’t like the limited drinking on offer in my village (despite the number of pubs) but I’d like it even less if there were no options at all.

On the other hand I could just shut up and enjoy my beer in those “locals” a little further afield, that meet my beery desires so much better.

Or even take the radical step and open a craft beer in my own neck of the  woods. Now there’s a thought…



3 Comments to “A little local understanding”

  1. Knowing the village well to which you refer, I’d like to endorse your opinions of the variety, or lack of. My sister lives there, and i isot often. We never visit the pubs. Maybe we should? Frankly, having been brought up there, I rather think the locals are particularly interested in quality. I may well post a proper reply later on this subject.

    In the meantime, I think this was a great first blog. Might even do one myself.

    • That should have read the locals aren’t interested in quality!!

      • I’ve been mulling that idea over for a few days. Maybe we overestimate other people’s “quality threshold” and actually the majority are quite happy to accept something that the more passionate amongst us are deeply disappointed with. I’m not sure it is just this one location, but there is certainly an embeded status quo there!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: